The Battle between Myth and Fact in Wireless Societies

During recent years the WHO, World Health Organization and IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer have lost credibility, because:

-          WHO supports the lenient and thermal-only based ICNIRP guidelines that do not offer the public protection from the cumulative effects of increasing electromagnetic radiofrequency or microwave exposure.

-          WHO has No plans for collecting data on EMR adverse health effects in Wireless societies despite a massive increase in illness following the rollout of new untested wireless technologies.

-          IARC ignores the increase in Cancer Clusters e.g. surrounding mobile-phone base-stations, though their existence has been documented in scientific studies.

-          IARC does not initiate or promote research into these Cancer Clusters.

Is the representation of WHO and IARC here today, an attempt to justify that The Research Programme on Non-ionizing Radiation has given nearly half the available research funding to Jørgen Olsen, head of research at the Institute of Epidemiological Cancer Research, The Danish Cancer Society, i.e. to epidemiological studies.

Director Peter C. Gøtzsche from the Nordic Cochrane Center has publicly claimed, that research shows, that scientists often are eager to please Industry sponsors - and the Danish Cohort study by the Danish Cancer Society was funded by Industry: TDC & Sonofon.

It`s easy to manipulate Epidemiological Research, and in the Danish Update Cohort Study for instance. 200.000 active, corporate “heavy” mobile-phone subscribers were excluded from the “testgroup” and transferred to the “control group”.

Therefore it is no wonder that the study showed a degraded Cancer risk for mobile-phone users.

Manipulation of epidemiological Cancer science prevents the discovery of causalities, thus hindering prevention and control of the disease.

The Danish Update Cohort Study has been sharply criticised by:

-          Dr. George Carlo, former head of the American WTR – Wireless Technology Research Project

-          Lennart Hardell, experienced cancer researcher

-          Lloyd Morgan, Director of the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States and statistics expert with PowerWatch UK

-          Cindy Sage, environmental consultant and public policy researcher

-          Sianette Kwee, retired Danish Biochemistry researcher, who has chaired numerous international science panels

Careful examination of the scientific criticism of the Danish Update Cohort Study yields the conclusion, that it has produced false negative results. This is probably fully intentional, in order to support the myth of “No Risk” from mobile-phones and obscure the facts.

Our tax money is not to be spent on misleading or misinforming the population.

As citizens, we demand that the Danish Cancer Society refunds the money spent on completing the Update Cohort Study.

It`s necessary to include non-thermal biological research results, Cancer Cluster results and Russian biophysical research results to make a proper risk evaluation of wireless exposure.

(Please read page 2 & 3)

When will WHO and ICNIRP change the basis of risk evaluation?

Hopefully soon.

Bente-Ingrid Bruun                                Henrik Eiriksson

Autor, Cand. Psych. Aut.                      Independent It–Consultant

bibruun@viljens-kraft.dk                     henrik@solvation.net