The latest stone thrown at the 200-billion-dollar-a-year cell phone industry came from a study by neurosurgeon Vini G. Khurana entitled Mobile Phone-Brain Tumour: Public Health Advisory.

An astronomer once quipped that if Neil Armstrong had taken a cell phone to the Moon in 1969, it would have appeared to be the third most powerful source of microwave radiation in the universe, next only to the Sun and the Milky Way. He was right.

Incubators are largely used to preserve
preterm and sick babies from postnatal stressors, but
their motors produce high electromagnetic fields (EMFs).
Newborns are chronically exposed to these EMFs, but no
studies about their effects on the fragile developing
neonatal structure exist.

...the data presented below compellingly suggest that the link
between mobile phones and brain tumours should no longer be regarded as a
myth. Individual and class action lawsuits have been filed in the USA, and at
least one has already been successfully prosecuted, regarding the cell phone-brain
tumour link.

The objective of this nationwide study was to assess the association between cellular phone use and development of parotid gland tumors (PGTs).

Abstract. We evaluated long-term use of mobile phones and
the risk for brain tumours in case-control studies published
so far on this issue.

Electromagnetic (hyper) sensitivity, or EHS, is a potentially highly significant public health
problem. Eltiti et al (2007) recently concluded that short-term exposure to a GSM base station-like
signal did not affect well-being or physiological functions in individuals and a positive reaction to
UMTS was dismissed as an artefact.

*peer reviewed study*

Cohen A, Carlo G, Davidson A, White M, Geoghan C, Goldsworthy A,
Johansson O, Maisch D, O'Connor E, "Sensitivity to mobile phone base
station signals", Env Health Perspect 2008; 116: A63-A64_

Advances in our understanding of the etiology of
cutaneous melanoma over the past decade have implicated
constitutive heredity alterations in a small percentage
of cases (5-8%).

*Peer-reviewed paper.*

Canadian Human Rights Commission policy on Environmental Sensitivities